Skip to main content

The Malaysian Flag- Part 2 The People's Views



The Malaysian Flag- Part 2 The People's Views



The Masthead of Utusan Melayu dated 3 Sept 1949 (below), and the masthead of The Malay Mail dated 15 Nov. 1949 (underneath it). Utusan Melayu was published in Singapore before moving to Kuala Lumpur. The Malay Mail was an English daily published in Kuala Lumpur. It changed to an afternoon paper after it was bought over by The Straits Times. The following views and comments by the people of then Malaya were qouted from these two newspapers. More here


<





The MALAYSIAN FLAG Part 2: The People's View

In 1949, newspapers and radio were the only mode of mass communication in Malaya. There were no Internet, no mobile phones and no television. More people could have participated in the choice of the flag of Malaya. But, based on the three available designs, most likely and the obvious choice would still be design listed as number 3.

In The Malay Mail poll, the newspaper revealed that some 45% chose the third design, about 5% chose the first design and only one chose design number 2. No actual number was given. However, the newspaper itself indicated that the participation was low. There was no similar poll taken by the Utusan Melayu. The Malay Mail in an editorial suggested that opinion of rural people should also be taken into consideration and this could be done by the information department. Whether such action was taken could not be ascertained.

Different people have different ideas about what the national flag should be, ranging from emotional feeling to what colours should be used.

"Sir, none of the three proposed designs for the national flag of the Federation showed any nantionalism in them," says a letter in the Utusan Melayu on 6 December, 1949. Only in the third design was yellow colour used in the crescent and star, yellow being the famous royal colour . Is this colour steeped in Malay customs to be left out?

"Moreover, in my view there was nothing in all the thee designs to show a close relantionship between the royal and the people based on Malayan nationalism originated from the Malay. This is because of absence from the flag "red and white" the flag of original Malay nationalism since Hang Tuah's period. " the letter added.

Therefore, since Malaya is on the way to independence, may I suggest that the Federation flag should be based on "red and white" and a quarter of the red should be in blue and the crossed krisses in yellow and encirled by eleven stars in white," says Hasnad.

In The Malay Mail, a reader named D.M.F. lamented that "Britain has no place in the Federation flags which were submitted to the Legislative Council..." (MM, 21 November, 1949).
The reader suggested that Malaya follow the footsteps of South Africa, Canada and Australia "who all have small reproductions of the Union Jack in the left-handhand corner in their national flags. The reader also suggested that the crossed krisses in the first choice should make the design eminently suitable.

The Malay Mail wrote an editorial on the flag issue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Yang DiPertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan Proclaimed the Chancellor of UKM

The arrival of the Yang DiPertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan at the Dectar compund Photo Credit: PRO UKM

The Malaysian Flag Part 1: The Beginning

THE MALAYSIAN FLAG: Part 1 The Beginning INTRODUCTION The Malaysian Flag, popularly known as Jalur Gemilang or the Stripes of Glory, is a very important symbol of Malaysia. Its history began not with the formation of Malaysia but in 1949; more than a year after the Federation of Malaya was established. The flag had been hoisted in many places such as Mount Everest, the North Pole, the Antartica , and it went around the world and into space. From September 16, 2010, the flag has a greater and special meaning throughout the nooks and corners of the country.

Abolish ISA?

Cattleya: First bloom from my mini garden If all people can be as pure as this orchid, I think laws are irrelevant. Abolish ISA Movement has a new supporter in Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, former Prime Minister of Malaysia. This is perhaps the strongest voice yet in support of abolising the law seen by many as very restrictive and draconian. No doubt the Government will take due cognizance of this new support. But the reality is whether the law, a remnant of the Malayan Emergency, is still relevant in the present circumstances. The recent Jakarta bombing of two international hotels will not go unnoticed by the Government and rightly so. In principle, I believe, under the present circumstances, many would agree that the law should remain but some amendments have to be made to the law to reduce its "harshness". Prof Reginald Hugh Hickling, when he was at the AG Chambers, was responsible for drafting the ISA when Malaya wanted to end the 12-year Malayan Emergency i