Skip to main content

Home Ministry banned 13 publications with immoral contents

Transferred from my other blog. Caution...This is last year's posting.

The Home Ministry (KDN) has issued a prohibition order banning 13 publications with immoral contents, unsuitable for reading public (See Bernama, 21 July, 2009).

The banned publications include: Cinta Awak Dalam Sehari, Pengantin Remaja, Masalah Seksual Yang Anda Malu Tanya, Rahsia dalam Rahsia Di sebalik Tirai Kamar Suami Isteri, Isteri Romantik di Kamar Yang Indah, dan Suami Romantik di Kamar Yang Indah.
Others are: Senggama kubur, Rintihan Jiwa Seorang Lesbian, Oh Fazrah, Serakah Anak-anak Zombie, Menyingkap Rahsia Keistimewaan Wanita, Pertama Gemilang dan Khazanah Mutiara Hikmah Suami Isteri dan Bakal Pengantin.

Gazetting of the prohibition order was made under section 7(1) of the Publication and Printing Presses Act 1984, punishable under sub-section 2, section 8 of the Act.

Principal Assistant Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Aziz Abdul Latif, said it was an offence to print, produce, reproduce, publish, sell, distribute or possess the publications.

Offenders could be jailed not more than three years or fined not more than RM20,000.00 or both. - Bernama.

The Law:

Section 7 and 8 comes under Part IV Control of Undesirable Publications with Undesirable Publications, of the Publication and Printing Presses Act 1984.

Section 7 Undesirable Publications.

(1) If the Minister is satisfied that any publication contains any article, caricature, photograph, report, notes, writing, sound, music, statement or any other thing which is in any manner prejudicial to or likely to be prejudicial to public order, morality, security, the relationship with any forfeign country or government, or which is likely to alarm public opinion, or which is or is likely to be contrary to any law or is otherwise prejudicial to or is likely to be prejudicial to public interest or national interest, he may in his absolute discretion by order published in the Gazette prohibit, either absolutely or subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, the printing, importation, production, reproduction, publishing, sale, issue, circulation, distribution or possession of that publication and future publications of the publisher concerned.

Section 8 (2) Any person who prints, imports, produces, reproduces, publishes, sells, issues, circulates, offers for sale, distributes or has in his possession for such purpose any prohibited publication shall be guilty for a term not exceeding three years or to a fine not exceeding twenty thousand ringgit or to both.

Comment: If people continue to write such materials and there are publishers willing to publish them without regard for the society's well-being, the law will continue to be relevant. The Government will continue to be the guardian of morality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Yang DiPertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan Proclaimed the Chancellor of UKM

The arrival of the Yang DiPertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan at the Dectar compund Photo Credit: PRO UKM

The Malaysian Flag Part 1: The Beginning

THE MALAYSIAN FLAG: Part 1 The Beginning INTRODUCTION The Malaysian Flag, popularly known as Jalur Gemilang or the Stripes of Glory, is a very important symbol of Malaysia. Its history began not with the formation of Malaysia but in 1949; more than a year after the Federation of Malaya was established. The flag had been hoisted in many places such as Mount Everest, the North Pole, the Antartica , and it went around the world and into space. From September 16, 2010, the flag has a greater and special meaning throughout the nooks and corners of the country.

Abolish ISA?

Cattleya: First bloom from my mini garden If all people can be as pure as this orchid, I think laws are irrelevant. Abolish ISA Movement has a new supporter in Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, former Prime Minister of Malaysia. This is perhaps the strongest voice yet in support of abolising the law seen by many as very restrictive and draconian. No doubt the Government will take due cognizance of this new support. But the reality is whether the law, a remnant of the Malayan Emergency, is still relevant in the present circumstances. The recent Jakarta bombing of two international hotels will not go unnoticed by the Government and rightly so. In principle, I believe, under the present circumstances, many would agree that the law should remain but some amendments have to be made to the law to reduce its "harshness". Prof Reginald Hugh Hickling, when he was at the AG Chambers, was responsible for drafting the ISA when Malaya wanted to end the 12-year Malayan Emergency i